Off the wall: Autumn 2015

A round-up of some of the more unusual stories coming out of the waste and resources world...

resource.co | 16 November 2015

Looking for trouble

Waste collectors often have to sift out contamination from recycling, but Lewisham Shopping Centre made it particularly hard for itself. Due to a printing error, whichever side you approached its bins from, recycling went in the left section, mixing the two streams. The error was spotted by vigilant resident Oli Sheppard, who’s studying for a master’s in environmental management. Sheppard told the Evening Standard: “It’s sad to see that just a simple thing like that is not being conveyed to people in the right way. It’s funny, but there is a deeper issue.”

The blunder has a happy ending, though. Manager Paul Redden told Resource the signs were removed right away, adding: “All of our waste is sifted with all recyclable waste picked from the bins to ensure that cross-contamination does not occur. None of our waste goes to landfill and currently over 70 per cent of our waste is recycled.”

Automatic fire

If ever there were an argument against both guns and burning rubbish, here it is: a man in Kansas has tried to put out a rubbish fire by driving over it... in a van loaded with live ammunition. The man, who has not been named, was burning waste in a field when the fire got out of hand. He rushed to extinguish it by driving his van back and forth over the flames, but when the van’s tyres caught fire and he heard the sound of the live ammunition going off, the driver ran for safety. A fire crew arrived moments later to put out the fire, which now included extra scrap metal.

The man was not charged for his fly-tipping, though a spokesperson for the Clay County Sheriff’s Office noted that insurance costs will be his punishment: “It seems like he’s just going to have to take a loss on that vehicle, because I don’t think they’re going to cover it.”

 

Gert Lush

An advertising campaign promoting cosmetics retailer Lush’s packaging-free products has caused quite the storm in a soap-dish after being branded ‘pornographic’. The ‘Go Naked’ campaign, which appeared in stores across Australia, sought to highlight the company’s commitment to reduced packaging, while also promoting body confidence. After receiving complaints calling the campaign, which featured naked Lush staff with conveniently placed bars of soap, ‘pornographic’ and ‘nudity for the sake of causing a stir’, the Australian Advertising Standards Board ruled that the ad was in breach of codes regarding the treatment of nudity and sexuality.

More articles

resource.co article ai

User Avatar

How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?

User Avatar

There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.