Surrey Waste Partnership (SWP) is calling on residents to respond to its consultation on its revised Plan for Waste Management to help ‘make sure the county's waste is managed in the best, most cost effective way’.
The consultation, which opened on 3 July and runs until 12 October 2014, is asking residents to provide information on ‘what they need’ to help them reduce, reuse and recycle more waste.
According to SWP, managing householders’ waste is a ‘challenging and costly job’ so the Plan for Waste Management is revised on a ‘regular basis’ to ensure ‘Surrey’s waste [is managed] in the best, most cost effective way’.
Consultation details
The survey identifies the difference between eliminating and reducing waste, reuse and recycling and seeks to explore residents’ understanding and motivation around the waste being produced in their households and what they can do about it.
Residents are asked to complete a five-question multiple-choice questionnaire online, which includes the following questions:
‘Six key principles’
According to SWP, there are six ‘key’ principles that form its latest waste plan. These are:
SWP is made up of 11 district and borough councils across the county. It is one of the signatories of the Resource Association’s End Destinations of Recycling Charter, which seeks to inform the public about where their recycled materials end up, to improve transparency in the recycling supply chain and enhance public confidence in the recycling process.
Respond to Surrey Waste Partnership’s consultation on the Plan for Waste Management.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.