Significant drop in normal food waste service collections
Lidia Creech | 12 February 2021

There has been a significant reduction in ‘normal’ food waste service collections since September, according to the 17th Covid-19 impact survey carried out by the Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning and Transport (ADEPT).

The survey has been monitoring the impact of Covid-19 on waste services in English local authorities since March 2020.

Bins on street
Bins on street

The last edition of the survey was released in the week commencing 7 September 2020, after former Chair of ADEPT’s Waste Group Ian Fielding announced it would be put ‘on hold’, with ‘so many local authorities reporting a return to good or normal levels of service delivery’.

However, the 17th survey, which was released in the week commencing 1 February 2021, has revealed decreasing numbers of local authorities reporting their waste collections as operating normally.

A total of 80 per cent of councils reported residual waste collections are operating as normal, down from 90 per cent in early September.

Recycling collections have remained steady, with a drop of 2 per cent – from 77 per cent to three-quarters of local authorities reporting normal operations.

Food waste, bulky waste and garden waste collections are experiencing the most disruption, with 60 per cent, 73 per cent and 69 per cent of local councils, respectively, reporting these services as operating normally.

Furthermore, 30 per cent are experiencing minor disruption with their food waste collection services, up from 2 per cent in September 2020. A total of 22 per cent have reported minor or major disruption to bulky waste collections in the latest survey.

Nearly all (98 per cent) councils reported commercial waste services as operating normally – up from 57 per cent in the last survey.

In addition, waste arisings were reported to have increased across the board since last September, apart from those for clinical waste and street sweepings.

The main reasons for service disruptions were identified as: effects of self-isolation (reported by 61 per cent of responding authorities up from 5 per cent in September 2020), staff absence due to sickness (46 per cent, up from 6 per cent) and effects of social distancing (30 per cent).

The waste service experiencing most disruption was identified as Household Waste Recycling Centres, with 38 per cent of councils reporting minor disruption at these, 13 per cent experiencing major disruption, and 2 per cent experiencing severe disruption.

All Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) facilities were reported to be operating as normal.

In total, 78 per cent of local councils experienced up to a 20 per cent reduction in staff absence levels, up from 37 per cent in the previous survey.

Steve Palfrey, Chair of ADEPT’s Waste Group, said: “Although Covid infection rates were very high in early February, the impact on waste services seems to be comparable to June 2020, when case rates were much lower, reflecting the effective measures councils and contractors have put in place to minimise infection risks to staff and service users.

“I want to thank officers for taking the time to respond to the survey and, of course, our teams who are working so hard to maintain these critical services.”

The results of all waste impact surveys can be found on the ADEPT website.

More articles

resource.co article ai

User Avatar

How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?

User Avatar

There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.