The launch of Scotland’s deposit return scheme (DRS) has been delayed until at least October 2025. Resource unpacks the timeline of events that led to the delay.

After months of confusion and controversy, Lorna Slater in Scottish Parliament confirmed in Scottish Parliament on 7 June that Scotland's flagship deposit return scheme – originally slated for a launch date in August 2023 – would now be formally delayed until October 2025.
The new date will bring the Scottish initiative in line with the launch of a UK-wide scheme. While some will be celebrating the alignment that the delay will offer, others – such as Lorna Slater herself – have criticised the UK Government for 'scuppering' a scheme being pioneered by a devolved government. Industry stakeholders, such as the soft drinks industry, who have invested heavily in preparations ahead of the launch are raising concerns around compensation.
On 27 May, the UK Government granted a temporary exclusion to the Internal Market Act but did not include glass in the exclusion. The decision meant that the Scottish DRS could not ‘go ahead as planned’ according to Scotland’s Minister for Green Skills, Circular Economy and Biodiversity, Lorna Slater.
Scotland was due to launch its DRS on 1 March 2024, having delayed it from August 2023 earlier this year. DRS schemes in Wales, England and Northern Ireland are also set for October 2025.
On Twitter, Yousaf commented: “Today's decision to delay Scotland's Deposit Return Scheme to align with a UK scheme is a direct result of the UK Govt's deliberate efforts to undermine devolution. Be in no doubt, [the UK Government] has sought to deliberately sabotage DRS to override the will of the Scottish Parliament.
“Earlier today I met with over 80 producers, retailers [and] hospitality representatives, with the overwhelming view being expressed that due to [UK Government] interference, a Scottish scheme going ahead without glass would put some businesses at an unacceptable competitive disadvantage.
“Today is yet another dark day for devolution, where once again our [Scottish Parliament] has been undermined by the actions of a Tory Westminster Government. Further evidence that the only way we can protect Scotland's democracy and have true self-government is through independence.”
Resource has prepared a full timeline of events around the Scottish DRS.
What will happen next around the Scottish deposit return scheme?
There are still questions around whether the Scottish DRS will be allowed to include glass come October 2025, when the temporary exclusion expires. The Welsh DRS is currently also set to include glass.
The Scottish Government, private scheme administrator Circularity Scotland and other industry stakeholders have invested heavily in a scheme that would involve glass. Prior to the delay, Michael Topham, Chief Executive of Biffa, said that, as the logistics partner for the scheme, Biffa has already invested £65 million under the assumption that glass will be included.
It remains to be seen whether there will be any repayments for stakeholders since the DRS has been delayed.
Sky News reported on 8 June that Coca-Cola, Redbull and other companies are looking to claim millions in compensation due to the delay. Innis and Gun, one of the UK's biggest craft beer businesses, also told Sky News that it is ‘carefully considering’ whether to sue.
Yousaf previously suggested that the UK government should be financially responsible if the scheme was delayed, although this was rejected by Conservative MP and Secretary of State for Scotland Alister Jack.
The timeline of the Scottish deposit return scheme so far
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.