Plans to introduce separate food waste collections to every household in England by 2023 and ensure producers pay for the costs of managing their waste packaging have been included in the long-awaited Resources and Waste Strategy, released by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) this morning (18 December).
In the first significant government policy document in the sector since the 2011 Waste Review and the 2013 Waste Prevention Programme for England, the strategy, entitled ‘Our waste, our resources: A strategy for England’, outlines how the government aims to make the UK more resource efficient and reduce the amount of waste produced in the country, while moving the economy away from a linear economic model towards a more circular one that keeps materials in the system for as long as possible.
Beyond the introduction of separate food waste collections – which are subject to consultation – the strategy also outlines the government’s intention to invoke the ‘polluter pays’ principle and extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging to ensure producers pay the full net costs of managing packaging waste at the end of its life, bringing the UK in line with the approach taken already by many European countries including France and Germany.
Plans to roll out a deposit return scheme (DRS) for disposable beverage containers by 2023, setting a consistent set of dry recyclables to be collected by all councils and waste operators and introducing the electronic tracking of waste movements are also key policy announcements contained in the document.
Commenting on the launch of the strategy at Veolia’s materials recycling facility in Southwark, London, Environment Secretary Michael Gove said: “Our strategy sets out how we will go further and faster, to reduce, reuse, and recycle. Together we can move away from being a ‘throw-away’ society, to one that looks at waste as a valuable resource.
“We will cut our reliance on single-use plastics, end confusion over household recycling, tackle the problem of packaging by making polluters pay, and end the economic, environmental and moral scandal that is food waste. Through this plan we will cement our place as a world leader in resource efficiency, leaving our environment in a better state than we inherited it.”
The strategy, which has been delayed several times since its announcement last year, will be seen as a shot in the arm for England’s resources and waste sector, with England’s recycling rate continuing to flatline – the most recent Defra statistics reveal that the English ‘waste from households’ recycling rate has fallen once again, down 0.3 per cent to 44.8 per cent in 2017/18 – while export markets for recyclable waste saturate and even close in the wake of China’s decision to ban 24 grades of solid waste at the start of 2018, leaving a sizeable proportion of the UK’s recyclable waste with nowhere to go.
Key actions
In order to plot a course toward a more resource-efficient future, the strategy sets out five strategic ambitions:
These strategic ambitions complement those stated in other government publications in which resources and waste have been afforded significant consideration, including the Litter Strategy, the Clean Growth Strategy, the Industrial Strategy and the 25 Year Environment Plan.
Key actions in the strategy include:
Questions of funding
The strategy represents the latest intervention from the government as it works to get a handle on the UK’s waste problem and steer the country towards a more resource-efficient future. Actions taken in 2018 range from policy announcements on plastic waste, such as the commitment to eliminate ‘avoidable’ plastic waste by 2042 in the 25 Year Environment Plan and the launch of a £20-million fund for plastics research and innovation, to the introduction of new powers to tackle waste crime.
The strategy document also serves to provide a measure of clarity for the resources and waste industry with regard to policy as Brexit continues to be the great known unknown in the immediate future of the sector. However, despite committing to transposing the CEP into UK law in full, the strategy does state when referring to barriers to increasing the uptake of recycled materials that ‘leaving the EU provides us with an opportunity to review and streamline the regulatory environment to overcome these barriers’. This could be interpreted as paving the way for a revision of the separate collection requirements of dry recyclables as mandated by the 2011 Waste regulations.
A significant issue that increases risk and uncertainty in this area is the question of funding for Defra and the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP), given the budgetary constraints on Defra – from 2018/19 to 2020/21, Defra will see no additional funding, with its capital budget frozen at £600 million for each financial year. In fact, Defra’s departmental resource budget will be reduced from £1.6 billion to £1.5 billion between 2018/19 and 2019/20.
This is concerning, given Defra has already accommodated £147 million of budget cuts across 2017/18 and 2018/19. It is also the department with the most Brexit work streams – around 70 – and is still looking to take on 1,400 new staff by the Brexit deadline of 29 March 2019. WRAP is also under increasing budgetary pressure seeing its funding from Defra fall from £56 million in 2009/10 down to £15.5 million in 2015/16, a decrease of 72 per cent, while the Resources and Waste Strategy only commits £9.35 million to supporting WRAP’s work in 2018/19.
You can read ‘Our waste, our resources: A strategy for England’ in full on the Defra website.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.