Copyright House of Lords 2014/Photography by Roger Harris
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee is to question three government ministers on Tuesday (14 January) on how government intends to realise value from waste and attract more investment in the sector.
In the final evidence session of the six-month inquiry into the economic benefits of waste (largely limited to organic waste and waste gases produced by agriculture, industry and households), the committee will question Resource Minister Dan Rogerson, Business Minister Michael Fallon, and Energy Minster Greg Barker on how government can ‘maximise potential’, boost local authority ‘cooperation’ and ‘attract more investment’ in the waste sector.
Questions the committee will ask will cover:
The committee will also quiz ministers on whether government needs to ‘take a firmer line in making sure the potential of waste is maximised’ (following on from Rogerson’s first official letter to the industry that stated the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will be ‘stepping back’ from waste policy’ from April 2014’ due to budget cuts).
The committee has already heard from a range of business, third-sector, and government officials as part of its inquiry, which has included hearings on what encourages and discourages investment in waste technologies; how waste can be turned into new products; and how the EU prevents food waste.
A final report into the committee’s findings is expected to be published in ‘early 2014’.
The evidence session will take place on Tuesday, 14 January, starting at 10.40am. It can be watched live on Parliament TV.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.