A ‘dramatic’ increase in the closures of illegal waste sites has taken place in the last year according to the Environment Agency (EA).
Published today, the EA’s 2013 Waste Crime Report shows that its Illegal Waste Sites Taskforce shuts down 25 illicit operations every week. This has resulted in a ‘record’ total of 1,279 sites closed between April 2012 and March 2013, equating to a 70 per cent increase on the 2011/12 figures, reportedly due to the EA’s recent crackdown on illegal sites.
£1 billion cost to legitimate competition and HM treasury
It is estimated that waste crime diverts almost £1bn every year from legitimate businesses and HM Treasury.
Illegal operations reduce costs and undercut competition by not funding safe and responsible waste disposal, thereby offering collection and treatment at a lower price. They also reduce tax receipts and inhibit the growth of the sustainable waste sector according to the EA.
The 2012-13 report also details the prevention of illegal exports, serious dumping incidents and illegal waste sites where waste is burnt and or buried with no environmental safeguards in place. The EA states that these sites are a problem due to reasons such as fly infestations, acrid smoke and piles of waste affecting quality of life. They can also lead to serious pollution incidents.
Ed Mitchell, Director of Environment and Business at the Environment Agency, said: “Waste crime puts people and the environment at risk, and undermines the legitimate waste industry. We are taking tough action to deal with this problem, through the improved use of intelligence and stronger partnerships with the police and other enforcement bodies. The two year Illegal Waste Sites Taskforce has been hugely successful in slashing the number of illegal waste sites operating in England.”
‘Considerable improvement’ in understanding waste crime
Despite the increasing closure of illegal waste sites, the EA continues to produce new targets in light of recent findings. The report reveals that:
‘Everyone has a role to play in reducing illegal waste activities’, stresses Mitchell in the report: ‘by taking responsibility for the waste we produce all the way to the final reuse, recycling or disposal, we can all ensure that it doesn’t end up in the hands of illegal operators.’
“Much more needs to be done”
Following the publication of the EA Waste Crime Report today, the Environmental Services Association (ESA) has warned that continued cuts to the agency’s budget are harming its ability to combat waste crime and is particularly concerned about the £200m tax avoidance scandal being carried out by some waste operators deliberately misclassifying waste going to landfill to avoid paying the correct amount of landfill tax.
Barry Dennis, ESA Director General comments that:“ESA welcomes the Environment Agency’s efforts to crack down on waste crime – but much more needs to be done.
This report makes clear that the Agency is taking tough action to deal with waste crime but ESA is concerned that continued cuts to the Agency’s crime fighting budget will adversely affect the Agency’s good work. The Agency is still discovering over 800 new illegal sites every year, many of which were in operation for more than 12 months, and ESA is concerned that every minute that such sites are in operation they will harm the environment, blight local communities and undercut responsible operators.
The report points out that illegal waste operators are diverting as much as £1 billion per annum away from legitimate businesses and taxpayers. ESA estimates that over £200 million of this is being lost to the public purse due to illegal operators deliberately misclassifying waste going to landfill to avoid paying the correct amount of landfill tax. This figure is likely to increase until the Government clamps down on this practice.”
For more information see the Environment Agency’s website
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.