Members of the waste and resources industry have voted Director of Zero Waste Scotland, Iain Gulland, as the person who most influenced the industry in 2013.
Thousands of people voted in Resource's annual Hot 100 list of the most influential people in the industry, with Iain Gulland moving up six places from last year’s list to come up top for his work in supporting the delivery of the Scottish Government's zero waste policy goals.
Those voting for Gulland lauded his 'determination', 'forward thinking', 'hard work' and 'never ending sphere of influence', as well as the fact he is 'relentlessly delivering the Scottish Government's vision – and not just on waste anymore. He's received energy and water efficiency and district heating remits in the last year'.
The announcement was made at the inaugural Kit Strange Memorial Lecture at the House of Commons yesterday (15 January), at which Steve Read, Managing Director of the Somerset Waste Partnership (and number 77 of this year’s list) delivered a speech remembering Kit Strange – who pioneered the idea of waste as a resource and was Director of the Resource Recovery Forum. Read’s lecture asked: ‘Are we any closer to a resource efficient world?’
Accepting a framed cover of Resource 75 (in which the full list can be found) from Resource Editor, Libby Peake (pictured above right), Gulland said he was ‘surprised and honoured’ to receive the award.
He later told Resource: "I am very honoured to have been voted No 1. Humbled as well, as I think of all the great people working in the resource sector across the UK. Thank you to all those who voted for me and to Resource Media for organising the whole thing."
The rest of the top 10 (and the reasons why the public voted for them) were:
Find out who else made the Hot 100 list for 2013 in Resource 75.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.