The Department of Health has announced that it will review the impact of microplastics on human health, following an inquiry by the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC).
The publication of an EAC’s report, ‘Environmental Impact of Microplastics’, this August prompted the government to announce a ban on plastic microbeads, tiny pieces of plastic less than five millimetres wide that are used as exfoliants in a range of cosmetic products such as body scrubs or toothpaste.
Microbeads, however, are only one source of microplastic marine pollution, which also enter the marine environment through the washing of polyester clothing and when larger pieces of plastic that enter the oceans break down into tiny pieces through exposure to sunlight and waves. Increasing scientific research is indicating that these particles enter the food web and wind up on our dinner plates, though little is know about their impact on human health.
In its report, the EAC, a cross-party group of MPs elected by the House of Commons to push government policy towards ‘environmental protection and sustainable development’, stated, however, that microplastics cause significant damage to the marine ecosystem and called for more research into the impact on human health. The damage comes about as fish and other creature ingest the material, with an estimated 80,000 to 219,000 tonnes of microplastics entering the oceans every from Europe.
Responding to the report, the government has said that it will:
New research from Defra (soon to be released) has also led the government to conclude that:
Government review “welcome news”
In response to the governments decision to review the effect of microplastics on human health, Mary Creagh MP, Chair of the Environmental Audit Committee, said: “It’s welcome news that the Chief Medical Officer will investigate the impact of microplastics on human health. Our inquiry recommended more research in this area – as microplastics are found frequently in seafood like shellfish and oysters.
“We also welcome the fact that Defra will shortly be publishing a report on the potential harm that microplastics can cause in the marine environment. We look forward to seeing the government bring forward its formal consultation on its plan to ban microbeads by the end of the year.”
The review will include a consultation that will then lead to proposed legislation for a ban on microbeads which will then be put before MPs for a vote.
The environmental impact of microplastics
As already mentioned, microplastics have a significant negative impact on marine ecosystems.
Micropbeads slip through waste treatment systems and enter the oceans where, along with larger pieces of plastic that have not entered the waste management process, they photodegrade, when exposed to the sun’s UV rays, into ever smaller pieces of plastic.
The Ellen MacArthur Foundation claimed in January that by 2050 there would be more plastic in the ocean than fish, owing to the leakage of eight million tonnes of plastics into the ocean every year.
An estimated 90 per cent of seabirds have ingested plastic, which can cause fatal gut blockages or stomach punctures. Microplastics not only cause physical harm to marine wildlife through their physical make-up, but also through the fact that pollutants such as DDT and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) attach themselves to the plastic, which potentially result in cancerous tumours or birth defects.
More information about the potential health impacts of marine plastic pollution can be found in Resource’s feature article.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.