EA releases latest Covid-19 regulation relaxations
Olivia Rutherford | 5 May 2020

The Environment Agency (EA) has released two further Covid-19 regulatory position statements (RPS) for waste operators, permitting the temporary storage of waste at unpermitted sites owned by operators and the temporary storage of incinerator bottom ash aggregate (IBAA) during the pandemic.

Yesterday (4 May), the EA released RPS C17 allowing waste operators to temporarily store waste at an unpermitted site that they control and allowing for storage limits of their registered T1 to T32 or S1 and S2 waste exemption to be exceeded.

Last week, the EA published RPS C16 (30 April) for waste operators, which allows for the temporary storage of incinerator bottom ash aggregate (IBAA) at their permitted site, when their permit does not allow storage of IBAA or when there is no storage capacity at the IBAA treatment facility.

These two EA regulatory statements are conditional, applying only when waste operators can demonstrate steps have been taken to avoid relying on this Covid-19 RPS. Approval must be sought from EA, who will assess the request and check the compliance history.

The conditions of the RPS expire on 30 September 2020, unless the EA decides to extend them.

These recent RPSs follow others published by the EA in recent weeks:


By relaxing requirements for waste operators through the RPS, EA seeks to ‘minimise risks to the environment and human health where, for reasons beyond their control, compliance with certain regulatory requirements may not be possible due to coronavirus’.

You can view the EA’s RPS C16 and RPS C17 on the EA website.

More articles

resource.co article ai

User Avatar

How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?

User Avatar

There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.