A draft version of England’s Single Use Carrier Bag Charges (England) Order 2015 has been published, clarifying which bags will fall under the charge from 5 October 2015.
The draft law, which was published on Wednesday (17 December), outlines that a single use carrier bag (SUCB) means ‘an unused bag made of lightweight plastic material with handles, other than an excluded bag’, such as ‘prescription-only medicine bags’ or ‘returnable multiple reuse bag’(made from material 'the thickness of which is not less than 50 microns but not greater than 70 microns').
It further details that ‘lightweight plastic material’ means ‘synthetic or semi-synthetic material made from polyamide, polyethylene, polylactic acid, polyvinyl chloride or other polymer, or any combination of polymers, the thickness of which is not greater than 70 microns’.
As such, any business (employing more than 250 employees) seeking to sell these bags ‘at the place in England where the goods are sold, for the purpose of enabling the goods to be taken away’ or ‘for the purpose of enabling the goods to be delivered to persons in England’, must charge a minimum of five pence (including any VAT) for each SUCB supplied in the reporting year (the period running 5 October 2015 - 6 April 2016 in the first year, changing to 7 April – 6 April thereafter).
There is no mention of what the VAT will be used for, however last month, Resource Minister Dan Rogerson wrote to the Chair of the Environmental Audit Committee, Joan Walley MP, (on the back of calls for it to spend VAT raised from the charge on new environmental programmes, and to cover the costs of monitoring the effectiveness of the scheme), stating that ‘allocating revenues to particular spending programmes makes spending decisions inflexible and can lead to a misallocation of resources, with reduced value for money for taxpayers’.
Record keeping
The draft law stipulates that sellers must keep a record in relation to the relevant reporting year, including the following information:
The seller must keep the record for a period of three years beginning on 31 May in the reporting year following that to which the record relates.
The seller must then supply a copy of the record to the Secretary of State for Environment (currently Liz Truss) on or before 31st May in the reporting year following that to which the record relates; and ‘in an electronic or other format reasonably required by the Secretary of State for the purposes of publishing the records or producing statistics’.
The Secretary of State must also publish every record supplied ‘on or before 31st July in the reporting year following that to which the record relates’.
Sellers could be fined up to £20,000
The law stipulates that local authorities (LAs) will be the administrator of the charge, and may, ‘for the purpose of enforcing this Order’:
However, these powers may only be exercised if the administrator ‘reasonably believes that a breach has occurred’.
If the LA finds that, ‘on the balance of probabilities’ a breach has occurred, it may by notice impose a fixed monetary penalty on a seller. This would be:
The seller must pay half of the penalty within 28 days of the notice. The remainder must be paid in the following 28 days. In the case of early/late payment, the penalty will be decreased/increased by 50 per cent.
An administrator may also, by notice, impose one or more ‘discretionary requirement’s on a seller if they think a breach has occurred. This may only be exercised if a discretionary requirement has not been imposed on the seller on a previous occasion in relation to the same act or omission.
In these cases, the maximum penalties that can be issued are:
A variable monetary penalty must be paid by a seller within 56 days ‘beginning with the day on which the final notice imposing it was received’. A 50 per cent discount/increase may be applied for early/late payment.
If a seller fails to comply with a non-monetary discretionary requirement, an administrator may, by notice, impose a ‘non-compliance’ penalty on the seller, irrespective of whether a variable monetary penalty has also been imposed.
The maximum amount that may be imposed in any case is £5,000.
Again, this must be paid within 56 days. However, if the requirements of the non-monetary discretionary requirement are complied with before the 56 days expire, the liability to pay the non-compliance penalty will be discharged.
Reporting
All administrators would need to publish reports ‘in a prominent position’ on their websites relating to the cases in which a civil sanction has been imposed, and the cases in which liability to the penalty has been discharged.
The reports must cover:
These must be published on or before 31 May in the year following the period to which the information relates and, until 30 May in the year following the next period, must remain on the administrator’s website; and be available for inspection at the administrator’s office.
Future steps
The Order also outlines that by 5 October 2015, Defra’s Secretary of State needs to:
The Secretary of State would then need to review the order and publish the conclusions of the review in a report ‘before 5 October 2020’. This would need to include:
The Order would cease to have effect from 5 October 2022.
Read the draft version of England’s Single Use Carrier Bag Charges (England) Order 2015.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.