Cromwell Polythene: ‘Cheap isn’t always cheerful’
resource.co | 9 January 2018

Sponsored content

When purchasing equipment for waste and recycling collections, low-cost doesn’t always mean high-value, says Cromwell Polythene Managing Director James Lee.

With budgets under constant pressure, spending money on consumables is often a low priority – especially for basic ones such as refuse sacks. However, even ‘basic’ products can vary in quality. A ‘premium’ product offers quality, performance and consistency rather than potential short-term savings. Sometimes this will mean paying a higher price, but there’s truth in the saying ‘you get what you pay for’.

It can also be tempting to try and make savings with a ‘one size fits all’ approach; unfortunately this can backfire with even the simplest products. For example, if the liners in your bins are too small, they cannot be fitted correctly, and effective capacity is reduced. Oversized liners are no better as they are too big to secure around the top of the bin and simply fall in when anything is placed in it. That’s why we supply over 400 different sacks and bags of almost every size, shape and colour imaginable.

As a producer of polythene products, we have a closed loop sustainability strategy that not only sees recycled materials incorporated as much as possible into the products that we produce, but also encourages the return of post-industrial and post-consumer plastics, board and other materials to the production cycle for re-processing.

What to look for

There are a number of industry standards and third-party accreditations to help identify reliable suppliers. We are founding members of the Cleaning & Hygiene Suppliers Association (CHSA) Refuse Sack Standard Accreditation Scheme, for instance. The CHSA code of practice provides customers with an assurance of professional conduct, customer service and quality.

For more information visit www.cromwellpolythene.co.uk

More articles

resource.co article ai

User Avatar

How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?

User Avatar

There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.