A report released today (10 January) by the Institution of Mechanical Engineers has found that between 30 and 50 per cent of all food produced around the world is never consumed by humans.
‘Waste Not, Want Not’ blames the waste on issues as diverse as inadequate infrastructure and storage facilities, overly strict sell-by dates, supermarket offers and demand for cosmetically perfect food.
Findings
The Institution of Mechanical Engineers is now calling for urgent action to tackle the problem of global food waste, to feed a growing population and reduce increasing pressure on the resources needed to produce food, including land, water and energy.
Key findings, based on previous research compiled in the report, include:
‘Staggering’ food losses
Dr Tim Fox, Head of Energy and Environment at the Institution of Mechanical Engineers said:
“The amount of food wasted and lost around the world is staggering. This is food that could be used to feed the world’s growing population – as well as those in hunger today. It is also an unnecessary waste of the land, water and energy resources that were used in the production, processing and distribution of this food.
“The reasons for this situation range from poor engineering and agricultural practices, inadequate transport and storage infrastructure through to supermarkets demanding cosmetically perfect foodstuffs and encouraging consumers to overbuy through buy-one-get-one free offers.
“As water, land and energy resources come under increasing pressure from competing human demands, engineers have a crucial role to play in preventing food loss and waste by developing more efficient ways of growing, transporting and storing foods.
“But in order for this to happen governments, development agencies and organisation like the UN must work together to help change people’s mindsets on waste and discourage wasteful practices by farmers, food producers, supermarkets and consumers.”
Recommendations
Based on its findings, the Global Food Waste Not Want Not report recommends:
‘Lack of good, hard empirical data’
While much research has been done in the UK into the amounts and causes of food waste by consumers, experts largely agree that figures on food wasted worldwide throughout the supply chain is lacking.
Currently, estimates vary widely as to how much food is cumulatively wasted from field to fork and beyond; the most commonly quoted figure, first put forward by the Stockholm International Water Institute is that as much as half of food is wasted worldwide. However, a report released last November by Aalto University in Finland, put the figure at just 25 per cent. The Institution of Mechanical Engineers says the amount wasted is somewhere between 30 and 50 per cent.
Speaking to Resource, food waste campaigner Tristram Stuart pointed out: “There is a serious lack of good, hard empirical data on food waste. Only a few countries have done really systematic studies on food waste, and those have only done it on particular points in the supply chain.” He added that parts of the supply chain that waste substantial amounts of food, including fisheries, slaughterhouses and catering firms, are routinely omitted from research into supply chain waste.
A spokesperson for the Institution of Mechanical Engineers explained that today’s report is not based on newly commissioned research, but rather compiles and reacts to existing reports on the matter, by organisations including the UN’s Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO).
Read more about the global food waste scandal.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.