The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) have launched a call for evidence on how European environment and climate change policies affect the UK.
The call forms part of government’s Review of the Balance of Competences between the UK and the European Union (EU), and is thought be part of its efforts to understand the impacts of a potential exit from the EU.
According to Defra, the review will ‘provide an informed and objective analysis of what EU membership means for the UK and our national interest’, and in this case will specifically gauge the EU’s competence (power to act) in the areas of the environment and climate change.
The call for evidence document says that the review aims to ‘deepen public and parliamentary understanding of the nature of our EU membership and provide a constructive and serious contribution to the national and wider European debate about modernising, reforming and improving the EU in the face of collective challenges’.
Topics under scrutiny in the environment and climate change review include EU directives, laws and regulations on a range of topics including waste management, water, energy (excluding renewable energy and energy efficiency – to be subject of the Energy Report), land use, air quality, pesticides and genetically modified organisms, amongst others. The call for evidence also asks for thoughts and evidence on the impacts of the European Environment Agency and LIFE+ (the Financial Instrument for the Environment).
Key questions asked as part of the call for evidence include:
The call asks for anyone with ‘relevant knowledge, expertise or experience’ to respond.
Submissions will be accepted until 12 August 2013.
Read the call for evidence document.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.