Recycling and renewable energy company, FCC Environment, has been awarded a contract to collect residual waste from 150 businesses in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire.
Recycling company DS Smith Recycling, who currently handle the recycling needs for these businesses, awarded the contract to FCC Environment to handle the non-recyclable residual waste that is otherwise diverted to landfill.
As much as 2,000 tonnes per annum of collected residual waste will be treated at FCC Environment’s energy from waste (EfW) facility in Eastcroft, Nottingham (pictured). The facility generates steam for heating more than 4,000 homes as well as public buildings in Nottingham.
“This contract recognises FCC Environment’s commitment to supporting businesses of all sizes to recycle more and generate energy from what cannot be recycled. It shows the progress we’ve already made in developing appropriate collection and treatment capabilities”, said Paul Burnell, C&I director at FCC Environment.
“FCC Environment has an ambitious programme of securing waste streams through the development and expansion of a commercial and industrial collection service, and we are also introducing appropriate waste treatment infrastructure across our business to support our customers’ recycling and recovery needs.”
Tim Price, the national Commercial Manager at DS Smith Recycling, said: “We are committed to helping our customers implement sustainable waste management practices. We are confident that FCC Environment offers the capabilities, both in terms of collection and treatment, to support our customers’ landfill diversion ambitions.”
Residual waste collection for businesses is currently being introduced in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire but is planned for introduction in the South East and East Anglia later this year.
Further information can be found on FCC Environment’s website.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.