The government’s Advisory Committee on Packaging (ACP) has said that councils should be responsible for supplying markets with recycled material.
Writing in the foreword to ACP’s annual report, Chairman Bob Lisney, said: ‘In a recovery system which is fragmented at the point of collection in the domestic sector by public sector statutory roles, it is easy to see that this creates a challenge in a market driven system. Thus one of our recommendations is to suggest that local councils be given a statutory role to play a role of supplier of materials to the market as well as its role to provide general services for waste and recycling.’
The report goes on to say that the government should encourage councils to ‘use the new contract specifications and advice developed by WRAP and iESE [Improvement and Efficiency South East]’ and suggests that the PRN/PERN system should also be reviewed as there is evidence that there are differences that disadvantage UK-based reprocessors.
A spokesman for the Environmental Services Association (ESA) said that though the organisation “advocated the benefits of an integrated approach to ensuring that collection methods, recovery infrastructure and end markets are aligned as effectively as possible”, it was “not quite sure how the new statutory responsibility referred to by the ACP would work in practice”. The spokesperson went on to say that the ESA would, however, be interested to see the detail of the proposals when available.
“We were also interested to note that the ACP chose to recommend a preferred procurement route for local authorities [the iESE framework], which is not something which appears to us to be within their core remit”, he added.
The recommendations in the ACP report also included:
The full annual report for 2011/12 can be found on the National Packaging Waste Database website.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.