Though it wasn’t given as much attention as other sectors in the run-up to Copenhagen, food production accounts for nearly a quarter of humanity’s ecological footprint. What’s more, nearly 40 per cent of ice-free land on the earth is given over to farming and almost 70 per cent of fish stocks are at the limit of or have passed the point of sustainability.
Unfortunately, there’s no easy solution: encouraging people to cut back on meat and dairy, for instance, usually results in public backlash and a successful movement of this kind would have ripples around the world, including making fertilizer less available for climate-friendly forms of farming. And it’s not always easy to know what’s sustainable; the American Chemical Society conducted a lifecycle assessment of salmon fishing and found that what farmed salmon are fed, how wild salmon are caught and whether stocks are frozen or fresh matter more than whether or not they’re wild or organic.
To help policy makers out (at least as far as meat-eating is concerned), WWF commissioned the Food Ethics Council to produce a report outlining how emissions relating to the consumption of livestock could be reduced and how government could change consumption behaviour. The report can be downloaded at: www.foodethicscouncil.org
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.