110 containers of toxic electric arc furnace dust (EAFD) were found abandoned at Malaysia’s Port of Tanjung Pelepas (PTP) last month, state media Bernama reported last week (19 July). The discarded waste is of Romanian origin, and was bound for Indonesia, entering the country illegally.
According to Malaysia’s Environment and Water Minister Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man, the illegal shipment weighed 1,864 tonnes, making it the country’s largest case of dumped toxic waste. The EAFD, classified as toxic waste under the Basel Convention, has been listed as concentrated zinc in declaration forms.
The Malaysian Department of Environment (DOE) has contacted the Romanian Basel Convention authority to arrange the repatriation of the illegal waste shipment.
This comes as the latest in a series of illegal waste import cases in Malaysia – according to Tuan Man, the DOE, cooperating with the Royal Malaysian Customs Department and port authorities, has thwarted 28 attempts to illegally import scheduled waste in the first half of this year.
Following China’s 2018 ban on 24 grades of solid waste, and its subsequent crackdown on illegal waste imports, Malaysia quickly became one of the world’s most popular destinations for plastic waste. In the first four months following China’s ban, UK plastic waste exports to Malaysia tripled, and August of that year saw the Malaysian government follow China’s lead, banning imports of plastic waste altogether.
Earlier this year, the Malaysian government announced that it would be returning 3,737 tonnes of illegally imported plastic waste, with the majority being repatriated to developed countries including the US, France and the UK. In a Facebook post, Malaysian Environment Minister Yeo Bee Yin said that the country was “serious about combating the import of illegal wastes” and that it would not become the “garbage bin of the world”.
Get our weekly digest
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.