ESWET, a European association representing manufacturers in the Energy from Waste (EfW) field, has praised the European Commission's new roadmap on the carbon removal certification.

According to ESWET, the carbon removal certification is ‘a positive first step’ towards successfully implementing carbon capture, storage and utilisation (CCUS) technologies in Europe. The association also highlighted that specificities of all sectors, including EfW, should be taken into account to achieve the ‘2050 carbon-neutrality objectives’.
Considering the role that CCUS could play in achieving decarbonisation, ESWET referred to the latest IPCC report, which states that capturing and permanently storing biogenic CO2 can “enable waste to be a net-zero or even net-negative emissions energy source”.
Due to the heterogeneous composition of the non-recyclable waste treated, ESWET states, about 50 per cent of the emissions emitted by EfW plants are of biogenic origin, meaning from biomass. The association says that integration of CCUS could allow these plants to turn into carbon-negative emitters.
The association also asserted that thorough regulation regarding the successful implementation of CCUS in EfW plants is currently missing at an EU level.
With the aim of enabling the EfW sector to fully contribute to the EU decarbonisation efforts, ESWET has called for the carbon removal certification to:
A solid certification scheme, ESWET said, could also develop the full value chain, including carbon transport, storage and utilisation. In response to increased financial support for the full-scale deployment of infrastructure in Europe and the effectiveness of carbon removals, the association added, clear regulation should provide visibility to investors and facilitate new projects.
resource.co article ai
How will the government and DMOs address the challenges of including glass in DRS while ensuring a level playing field across the UK?
There's no easy solution to include glass in the DRS while maintaining a level playing field. Potential approaches include a phased introduction of glass, potentially with higher deposits to reflect its logistical challenges. The government and DMOs could incentivise innovation in glass packaging design and subsidise dedicated return points for glass-handling. Exemptions for smaller businesses unable to handle glass might also be necessary. Any successful solution will likely blend several approaches. It must address the differing priorities of devolved administrations, balance environmental benefits with logistical and cost implications, and be supported by robust consumer education campaigns emphasizing the importance of glass recycling.